Thanks to /u/-AllIsVanity- for posting this on reddit.

What does it mean to entitle our presentation “Buddhism, Radical Critique and Revolutionary Praxis”?  One possible answer is that it implies that we want to know how Buddhism might help those of us who are present today engage in the process of radical critique and revolutionary transformation.  If this is our goal, we need to pose at least three other questions: First, what does “Buddhism” or perhaps more pertinently, “Buddha,” mean?  Second, what does “radical critique” mean?  And finally, what does “revolution” mean?  Of course, there’s also the question of what “mean” means.  In the present context, it means that we need to consider the senses in which all three of these terms, taken together, can be practically significant to us, here and now.

John Clark

Full paper here